Survival and Emergency Preparedness

News leads off with "GRIM NEW PROJECTIONS FROM THE WHITEHOUSE"
Same info +/- a little as before.

Then - the NEW projected death rates in Florida may reach ~6000 by August!!!!

Florida = 22,000,000
Corona deaths = 6000

That is a death rate of .03%
Not 3%, but 00.03 percent or .0003

And of course, no stratification by age group. I'm gonna find the flue death rate and do a little math. I agree - it sucks for anyone

I've been saying for a long time that the MSM is the enemy of the people.

This is a Q drop from March 28, 2020. Folks can think Q is for those that wear tin foil hats if they wish, but this is because they haven't followed Q very much if at all. At any rate, read the drop as it touches on exactly what you've put in the OP.

https://qmap.pub/read/3905


Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
28 Mar 2020 - 3:15:18 PM
A person(s) value:
1. vote
2. monetary value (tax contribution)
3.
Why is 'free thought' ridiculed, challenged, and threatened when a person is opposed to the 'mainstream-narrative'?
[2] remains fixed (degree allowable by 'economic recession/expansion')
[1] remains a variable
[1] dependent on a 'controlled' system of information dissemination
What happens when 90% of the media is controlled/owned by (6) corporations?
What happens when those same corporations are operated and controlled by a political ideology?
What happens when the news is no longer free from bias?
What happens when the news is no longer reliable and independent?
What happens when the news is no longer trustworthy?
What happens when the news simply becomes an extension/arm of a political party?
Fact becomes fiction?
Fiction becomes fact?
When does news become propaganda?
Identity creation?
How does the average person, who is under constant financial stress (by design), find time to research and discern fact v fiction?
Majority of people more prone to believe someone in power sitting behind a big brand ‘news’ name?
Do people [human psyche] tend to follow the ‘majority/mainstream viewpoint’ in fear of being isolated and/or shunned?
‘Mainstream’ is used for a reason [dominate trend in opinion].
[If majority of people believe ‘x’ then ‘x’ must be validated / true]
Why do ‘mainstream’ media heads, within different orgs, always use the same keywords and/or catch phrases?
Coordinated? By who? Outside entity providing instructions?
Do they count on the fact that people [human psyche] are more prone to believe something if heard over-and-over again by different ‘trusted’ sources?
Do ‘echo chamber’ tactics provide validation / credibility to the topic/point being discussed?
Threat to intellectual freedom?
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
Read again – digest.
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
Logical thinking.
Why, after the election of 2016, did [D]’s and media corps jumpstart a [coordinated & planned] divisive blitz intended to create falsehoods re: illegitimacy of election, character assassination of POTUS through sexism, racism, every other ‘ism’?
Pre/post 2016 election?
Why were violent [masked] terror orgs such as Antifa immediately created/funded?
Why were these orgs tasked w/ immediate intimidation/shut down of any pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized to counter and silence pro-POTUS rally[s] and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized which divided people into sex/gender, race, [ism]?
When you control the levers of news dissemination, you control the narrative.
Control of the narrative = power
When you are blind, what do you see?
They want you divided.
Divided by religion.
Divided by sex.
Divided by political affiliation.
Divided by class.
When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those ‘different’ from you, not those responsible [controllers].
Divided you are weak.
Divided you pose no threat to their control.
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or stable [livestock kept – sheep].
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
THIS REPRESENTS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Q

No idea about Q as legit or tin foil. The mystery factor often makes me call BS. I have some standards for impressing me, and Q not even close.

But - that was some solid philosophy right there.

You haven't been following Q or researching into what he/they have been discussing in detail, so it would be hard to impress you due to lack of information.

I look at things like this; YT says it will ban any discussion on the WHO from non-qualified people. Then they banned the video of the two doctors in Kalifornia who stated they were cooking the books on CV19 deaths. Well...why? The were two doctors presenting their findings. Would that not be a qualified source? If not...why? Even Senator Cruz is weighing in on the situation asking why YT is censoring the information.

https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/04/29/ ... -hypes-it/

The MSM has gone into overdrive trying to convince people that the CDC didn't revise their CV19 deaths downward on Friday. The nightly news is still doom and gloom on CV19 despite evidence it is less deadly than the flu. They are downplaying Hydroxychloroquine in conjunction with a Z-pack as the cure despite all the evidence that it works. Perhaps because it does work and only costs 60 cents a pill rather than $1000 per pill for this new 'cure'. Wonder who's making $ off that?

BTW, has the MSM been covering the mass uprisings around the country, in blue states?

So yeah, MSM is the enemy of the people and has to go.

I saw that YouTube on the doctors.

They had some things that were questionable (just a few) and they opened themselves to questions and did not say they knew things they didn't.
At about the 6 min mark they nailed it right between the eyes much like I did above.

I see 2/3 of people unmasked at the grocery store every time I go...including grocery workers, and violations of the 6' rule all over - especially with staff. Yet the industry has not shut down because of a Corona outbreak.

Science? No - and I'm a scientist by education. However, all science begins with observation, and the observations clearly do NOT match or support the hypothesis, the conclusions, nor the actions...

Bob wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 12:28 pm No idea about Q as legit or tin foil.

Well, there have been hundred's of 'Q' proofs over the last several years. The latest was a day or so ago. Someone, an Anon, asked Q if he would ask Q+ to tweet out about Obama as a 'Q' proof. Q+ is considered the POTUS. That afternoon at exactly 3:11 is when President Trump tweeted out one word, 'Obamagate'. Q has used times before as clues. So both Q post 311 and 1511 (the military time for 3:11) both reference Obama.

Post 311:

What was the USSS codename for Hussein?
[R]
Define.
They knew all along.
Expand your thinking.
Q

The secret service code name for BO was Renegade. Usually a POTUS is assigned a code name, BO CHOSE renegade. What is the definition of renegade?

ren·e·gade
/ˈrenəˌɡād/
Learn to pronounce
noun
noun: renegade; plural noun: renegades

a person who deserts and betrays an organization, country, or set of principles.
synonyms: traitor, defector, deserter, turncoat, betrayer; More
rebel, mutineer;
quisling, fifth columnist;
rarerenegado, tergiversator
"he was denounced as a renegade"
antonyms: follower
archaic
a person who abandons religion; an apostate.
a person who behaves in a rebelliously unconventional manner.

adjective
adjective: renegade

having treacherously changed allegiance.
"a renegade bodyguard"
synonyms: treacherous, traitorous, disloyal, perfidious, treasonous, rebel, mutinous, rebellious
"350 army mutineers led by a renegade colonel"

Post 1511:


Barack Obama - Administration
First Lady Michelle Obama
Vice President Joseph Biden
Secretary of State John F. Kerry (2013-2017)
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton (2009-2013)
Secretary of Defense Ashton B. Carter (2015-2017)
Secretary of Defense Leon E. Panetta (2011-2013)
Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates (2009-2011)
Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel (2013-2015)
Secretary of the Interior Ken L. Salazar (2009-2013)
Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell (2013-2017)
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch (2015-2017)
Attorney General Eric H. Holder (2009-2015)
Secretary of the Treasury Jack Lew (2013-2017)
Secretary of the Treasury Timothy F. Geithner (2009-2013)
Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius (2009-2014)
Secretary of Health and Human Services Sylvia Mathews Burwell (2014-2017)
Secretary of Labor Thomas E. Perez (2013-2017)
Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis (2009-2013)
Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker (2013-2017)
Secretary of Commerce John Bryson (2011-2012)
Secretary of Commerce Gary Locke (2009-2011)
Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack (2009-2017)
Secretary of Education John King Jr. (2016-2017)
Secretary of Education Arne Duncan (2009-2016)
Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz (2013-2017)
Secretary of Energy Steven Chu (2009-2013)
Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson (2013-2017)
Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano (2009-2013)
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Shaun Donovan (2009-2014)
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Julián Castro (2014-2017)
Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx (2013-2017)
Secretary of Transportion Ray LaHood (2009-2013)
Secretary of Veterans Affairs Robert A. McDonald (2014-2017)
Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric Shinseki (2009-2014)
>>1764782
Search foreign posts (State).
Face important.
Q

Search it for yourself: https://qalerts.app/

So either it's just a coincidence that someone asks Q to ask Q+ (POTUS) to tweet something about BO and later that day POTUS tweets out about BO and the times direct anons back to two separate posts on BO...or there is more than you currently understand.

Remember, this 'conspiracy theory' is now worldwide with other world leaders referring to Q. Protesters around the world are wearing Q shirts/hats/ signs and tweeting out pics.

BTW, in regards to the MSM and deep state controlled social media, the tweet from POTUS yesterday of 'Obamagate' was trending on twitter with (at that time) nearly 3 million retweets. Twitter deleted 2 million of them within 2 hours without explanation. Yet it's till growing. So there's a little 1A censorship for ya. If Q is just a LARP, why the need to suppress it? Just a thought.

Dave - we really need to have a talk about what "proof" would be.

I myself - with no knowledge of this asked on another forum if Obama was going to be the New Nixon. (of course - maybe I said that to divert you from believing that I am Q)

When you want to believe that it isn't a coincidence, you have to prove how it COULDN'T be one. Not verify what you believe to be correct. That is called confirmation bias and basically an excuse to believe what you want. It doesn't mean you are wrong - but you can't prove you are right.

I can prove that midnight is the witching hour by showing that Charmed was showing at 12 midnight using your logic...which is not logic.

How many coincidence are required before it’s mathematically impossible?

So you don’t find it a bit...curious, that someone asked Q to ask Q+ (POTUS) to tweet the word Obamagate and Trump does that very thing the same day, with a tweet time that refers back to two Q posts from a couple of years ago that talk about Obamagate.

Got it.

Depending on the assumed base distribution, I can actually do the math on that...

You'll have to walk me through this sometime.