Grandfather Of Teen Killed By Homeowner During Burglary Claims AR-15 Made Fight “Unfair”
https://crime.awm.com/grandfather-of-te ... ht-unfair/
Here is a good example of a 'journalist' not really being qualified to write an article. For two reasons; first, she really doesn't know the subject matter, secondly, because several points in her article don't make sense.
For example:
Jacob died because he was outmatched by the AR-15. Now, the teenage victim’s grandfather, Leroy Schumacher, wants everyone to know that his grandson would not have been mowed down by a slew of bullets from a raging AR-15 assault rifle.
- Is there some requirement to be evenly matched in an armed home invasion?
- The second sentence doesn't even make sense. Read it, it doesn't form a complete thought. Additionally, how many is a 'slew of bullets'? The author neglected to state how many rounds were fired. Also, an AR15 is not, and never has been an 'assault' rifle. That's according to the governments own definition of an assault weapon (not to be confused with a politicians definition).
Next point:
Jacob Redfearn, 17, thought it would be easy to break into a home and steal everything of value. Because he was armed with a weapon – brass knuckles – Jacob thought he would be able to overpower anyone who happened to be in the house when he and two teenage friends broke in to commit armed robbery.
According to the grandfather, his grandson would not have died during the robbery if the homeowner’s son had not been equipped with the deadly weapon – but had been in possession of a firearm more at the same speed as the gun Jacob was using during the armed robbery.
Okay, so was Jacob armed with brass knuckles or a gun? The author of the article has conflicting information with no explanation. Also, the definition for using deadly force is generally along the lines of preventing grave bodily harm and/or death. Can brass knuckles cause grave bodily harm? Yes, they can which is why they were invented. So deadly force was appropriate to the situation and the resident was in no way required to put away his AR15 and meet the threats (he was outnumbered 3 to 1) with brass knuckles of his own.
“Brass knuckles against an AR-15, come on, who was afraid for their life,” he said.
Apparently the grandfather has never been hit with brass knuckles.
Although Jacob Redfearn was mowed down and mutilated by the spray of bullets from the AR-15, police were able to respond to the scene.
Another sentence that makes no sense. He was 'mowed down'? Really? And mutilated by a 'spray of bullets'? Is that factual or the author attempting dramatic flair? And it's a good thing the police were still able to respond even though he was 'mowed down'. This is really bad writing on the author's part.
Wagoner County officials did not charge the shooter with any crime – although he took at least one young life. After an investigation, deputies reported that the homeowner’s son was acting in self-defense when he opened fire on the teens with brass knuckles.
Self defense is legal, the author might want to do some actual research on the topic before attempting to write an article. Oh, and now Jason is back to having brass knuckles again?
So basically, three criminals attempted an armed home invasion on a resident that was properly armed and apparently knew how to defend himself. Self defense isn't suppose to be 'fair' and in fact if it's 'fair' you aren't doing it right. The criminals made a poor life choice and suffered the consequences of their actions. The person that wrote the article needs to take a course or two on how to actually write an article and needs to learn how to do some dispassionate research on the topic.
So bottom line is good guy '1' and bad guys '0' and the 'author' needs more education on how to write.