Page 3 of 17

Re: Not looking good for Trump

Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 2:25 pm
by David
No, it is a great way to preserve our Constitutional Republic. You’re incredibly short sighted Bob.

Re: Not looking good for Trump

Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2020 5:46 pm
by aerynsun
David wrote: Sat Nov 14, 2020 2:00 pm
aerynsun wrote: Sat Nov 14, 2020 12:23 pm After seeing the Wash. DC Trump rally - you have to wonder how Trump lost!
He did not lose. To expand on my previous post, in the event the election is deemed illegitimate, the vote becomes null and void. It then goes to the Congress. Each state gets one vote. Right now, 37 States are Republican controlled. I’m not saying this will be the route used, what I am saying is that this is Constitutional law and has been used twice in U.S. history. Once on 1800 and again in 1824. So if the election is deemed null and void due to a corrupt vote, which seems likely, this is the next step in the electoral process per the Constitution.
Well, that would fit perfectly in the year 2020

Re: Not looking good for Trump

Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2020 11:02 am
by David
I posted this on another board so it’s not directed at anyone here specifically, but wanted to include the information.

Trey Trainor the Chairman of the FEC (Federal Election Commission) publicly stated that it is his belief the election is illegitimate due to the massive amount of voter fraud. Now, let me put this in proper context so everyone fully understands the gravity of what is happening; the MSM is yelling from the roof tops that there is no voter fraud. The top government official on elections in the country is saying there is voter fraud on a massive scale. I saw the live interview. So why is the MSM reading from the same wrong script over and over? On what basis are they claiming there is no fraud when the highest election official publicly states there was, there are hundreds of signed affidavits from witnesses, court orders were ignored or not enforced, election laws were violated in several states, we have multiple whistle blowers coming forth and there is ongoing litigation.

Let that sink in for a moment. The MSM isn’t trying to educate you, they are trying to indoctrinate you. This isn’t fanciful wishing, this is ongoing, verifiable fact right in front of us.

Re: Not looking good for Trump

Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2020 11:41 am
by David
Another example of MSM bias from just 10 minutes ago...

I was watching 'Media Buzz' which is Howie Kurtz on Fox News. Actually, my wife was watching it while I was in the room as I don't normally watch trash like that. So while I'm watching, Howie Kurtz on live TV is going on about how there is no voter fraud being reported and that the postal worker whistle blower that claimed he was ordered to back date ballots recanted his testimony. One of the talking heads had to correct him that the man not only did not recant his testimony but was wearing a wire during the interview with the inspectors that were trying to pressure him into recanting and that the 2-hour audio was released for all to listen to. Howie Kurtz barely acknowledged the correction and immediately moved on to the next thing.

So here we have a Fox news personality that is either completely ignorant that what he's saying is false or he's lying through his teeth to continue forwarding a specific narrative. So let's see if we can figure out which one. Little ole Deputy Dave knew several days ago that the media was putting out that the man recanted his testimony and I also knew it was false because I saw the man's own statement and knew that he wore a wire during his interrogation (and that is what it was with a hostile interrogator) and that the interrogation was 2 hours in length and was now public for one and all to verify. I knew all this days ago. Fox News, a very large MSM news organization with inexhaustible resources to check and verify facts days after the facts were made public was still putting out false information and had to be corrected by one of the talking heads.

So you decide; Fox News is now an enemy of the people like CNN, MSNBC and the other alphabet MSM outlets or they are just woefully inept in their research?

Re: Not looking good for Trump

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 8:47 am
by tom mac
I'm also been watching NewsMax as Fox has been leaning ( orig owner turned it over to grandkids that lean )

Re: Not looking good for Trump

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 12:52 pm
by Bob
Well Dave, you have maybe not been a fan, but certainly used Fox News to support your cases for whatever.

I have been including Fox in the MSM category forever. I will comment they have (had) the best Leg on TV however - so they have (had) value for that. But that has always worked with the sound off!

And, when the MSM is that "in control" well, lets just buckle up and wait for Marxism. Or actually, it's already here. Damn - I thought Trump would save us from that....NOT. All he did was delay it. In fact, if anything, what he did was HELP it - people will (and apparently did) think twice before going populist again.

I'll say it again - Red/Blue, Repub/Dem, CNBC, CNN, Fox....NONE of them are about YOU.

Yet people watch them, and vote for them....Trump was an accidental Fly in the Ointment. They ALL wanted him out, and they will get it. #Bidenisyourpresdient #Respecttheoffice

Freedom, Democracy-Capitalism, accumulation of wealth, revolution, Socialism, descent into poverty, Despot, revolution, Freedom, Democracy....guess where we are in that cycle?

Re: Not looking good for Trump

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2020 1:28 pm
by David
Bob wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 12:52 pm Well Dave, you have maybe not been a fan, but certainly used Fox News to support your cases for whatever.
Not really. There is a difference between Fox 'news' and Fox 'opinion'. That fact that, when Shepard Smith was their #1 news guy, Fox leaned left even back then for 'news' coverage. Now that he's gone, they are moving even farther left. Opinion on the other hand is quite different with personalities like Tucker, Shaun, Jessie, Mark (Levine), Judge Jeanine etc. As far as politics go, THEY are the actual news and not the biased news on Fox. Also Barney and Maria on Fox business are quite good. As a side note, it is possible that a lot of personalities (the good ones that are actually journalists) will be leaving Fox shortly en mass. Tucker put out a tweet to that effect a few days ago.
Bob wrote: Mon Nov 16, 2020 12:52 pm Trump was an accidental Fly in the Ointment.
No, Trump was and is the culmination of a 20 year plan to take back the country. This is information that you are, unfortunately, unaware of at this time. However, several tens of millions do know this information. That is why 72+ million (and more if you count the discarded and switched ballots) voted for him and there are organic rallies springing up with tens of thousands of people across the country.

Trump won, and he will be inaugurated for a second term in January.

Re: Not looking good for Trump

Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 11:18 am
by Bob
A 20 year plan to take BACK the country, or take it AWAY....

Take back from who and give to who?

I can make a good argument that Trump is part of the plan to take it away from the people and give it over to socialism/communism etc....

So if you meant "take back" the country from the people - I can believe that.

Re: Not looking good for Trump

Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 11:30 am
by David
Believe what you wish to believe. From the information I'm seeing, it's taking it back from the Global elite i.e. New World Order. This is an area, and I don't say this in a disrespectful fashion, you have limited knowledge. Even with the research I've done I still have only scratched the surface of the Global Cabal. It goes a lot deeper than you understand.

Trump isn't going to defeat them, but he will delay their plans. Perhaps for decades.

Re: Not looking good for Trump

Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2020 12:51 pm
by Bob
Image